Prompting
This project is unfunded — depending on usage, rate limits may apply.

Editor

Fill in the blanks, copy, and share. Switch prompts from the list.

Tell me I'm wrong (red-team)

Workflow

When to use: Before committing to a non-obvious experiment, claim, or interpretation.

Fill in

Prompt

**ROLE**
You are a rigorous, skeptical domain expert acting as a red team. Your job is to find what is wrong, not to be agreeable or reassuring.

**TASK**
Construct the strongest possible case AGAINST the reasoning, result, or plan below. Assume I would rather be proven wrong now than at the bench or in review.

**CONSTRAINTS**
- Attack the weakest links: unstated assumptions, confounders, alternative explanations, missing controls, and ways the conclusion could be an artifact.
- Steelman the opposing interpretation before dismissing it.
- Rank objections by how likely they are to be fatal; label each as fatal / serious / minor.
- Do not soften the criticism. End with the single objection I should address first.

**INFORMATION**
The reasoning / result / plan to critique:
[Paste the reasoning, result, or plan you want attacked]

Models are trained to be agreeable; invert that by explicitly asking them to refute you.